May 31, 2008

Tek Bir Mukhiya


Visit An Exhibition of Tek Bir Mukhiya's Paintings

Read More...

May 30, 2008

The legend of the Greatest


Cassius Clay Defeats Sonny Liston for Heavyweight Championship –
Feb 25, 1964

In one of the most amazing upsets in the annals of sport, the brash young, 22-year old Olympic champion speed-talker stood firm against the brooding and seemingly indestructible heavyweight champ, Sonny Liston. The event was more than a mere world championship bout due to Clay's infectious taunting and media manipulation. It turned into white American conservative boxing circles against the proud, black athlete of his generation, Christianity against Islam, and in its wake the future of the modern celebrity athlete was born. In one night in Miami Florida, the Louisville Lip, Cassius Clay told the world he was the greatest, won in six rounds, despite the alleged cheating of Liston (the champ's corner was said to have put a foreign substance on his gloves, effectively blinding Clay for the entire fifth round) and became Muhammad Ali, the greatest, and invented the American icon of latter 20th century sport.

- 50 Greatest Sports Moments Of All Time



I Am the Greatest




I shook up the World



Muhammad Ali Tells As It Is



Muhammad Ali- The Greatest Speaks




Muhammad Ali- Recipe for Life



Interview Clips:
Muhammad Ali - Parkinson's Greatest Entertainers

Also see:
Wikipedia
Wiki Quotes

Read More...

May 29, 2008

The Story of Stuff

A thoughtful analysis of consumerism- the whole process from extraction of raw materials to production, distribution, consumption and disposal of manufactured goods.

"From its extraction through sale, use and disposal, all the stuff in our lives affects communities at home and abroad, yet most of this is hidden from view. The Story of Stuff is a 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns. The Story of Stuff exposes the connections between a huge number of environmental and social issues, and calls us together to create a more sustainable and just world. It'll teach you something, it'll make you laugh, and it just may change the way you look at all the stuff in your life forever."

- The Story of Stuff
The video is also available for download:
Click here to save (50 MB).

Read More...

May 27, 2008

Use your right brain

Jill Bolte Taylor: My stroke of insight

Jill Bolte Taylor got a research opportunity few brain scientists would wish for: She had a massive stroke, and watched as her brain functions -- motion, speech, self-awareness –- shut down one by one. An astonishing story.

- Ted.com



I found it very moving and insightful. When I sent the link to Neelu, she said, “I’ve seen this one.” Later when we were discussing this over the lunch, I found that Nitin had also seen the talk. A clue-- this is, perhaps, a scientific explanation of nirvana…

A must share.

The most e-mailed story on the NYT today is also on her:
A Superhighway to Bliss

Also listen to Ricard Mathieu from my previous post(The Happiest Man Ever). His talk is also available on Ted.

Read More...

Stories


Happy B'day Israel !

The Story of recyled clothing

Read More...

May 23, 2008

Yes We Can

Looks like I'm campaigning too... I'm sharing Barack Obama's 'Audacity Of Hope' in my office. This song is also very good...



Bobby Kennedy


"Men without hope, resigned to despair and oppression, do not make revolutions. It is when expectation replaces submission, when despair is touched with the awareness of possibility, that the forces of human desire and the passion for justice are unloosed."

"At the University of Natal in Durban, I was told the church to which most of the white population belongs teaches apartheid as a moral necessity. A questioner declared that few churches allow black Africans to pray with the white because the Bible says that is the way it should be, because God created Negroes to serve. "But suppose God is black", I replied. "What if we go to Heaven and we, all our lives, have treated the Negro as an inferior, and God is there, and we look up and He is not white? What then is our response?" There was no answer. Only silence." - South Africa, June 1966

Read More...

May 19, 2008

Taking home lessons from South African xenophobic violence

The xenophobic violence of South Africa could spread beyond its borders.

A man demolished a shack Monday in Ramaphosa, a settlement near Johannesburg where six immigrants have been killed. Joao Silva for The NYT

There is so much resentment towards people coming from the Indian heritage in Kathmandu that it could lead to such a mayhem any day. Kathmandu is like fragile motley. Everything required for an outbreak of a similar havoc is already in place. If you think this prediction is being cynical, then take the Feb 1, 2004 attack on Muslims as the evidence. Everything looked perfectly well for hundreds of years but a single incident exposed the farce and shattered the myth of our glorious religious tolerance. It is an open-secret that there is resentment among Newars, the original inhabitants of the valley, towards the Hilly people particularly Bhahuns- its origin can be traced back to the conquest of the valley by a Hilly king. “Father can’t be your enemy and Newar can never be your friend,” is an old adage ‘popular’ among the outsiders in the valley. Indians are doing so well and opening up successful enterprises in the country that many simply think they have deprived them of their fortune.

So what these poor, unskilled South Africans say comes as not a surprise but a confirmation:
“We want all these foreigners to go back to their own lands,” said Thapelo Mgoqi, who considers himself a leader in Ramaphosa. “We waited for our government to do something about these people. But they did nothing and so now we are doing it ourselves, and we will not be stopped.”

A familiar litany of complaints against foreigners are passionately, if not always rationally, argued: They commit crimes. They undercut wages. They hold jobs that others deserve.

George Booysen said that as a born-again Christian he did not believe in killing. Still, something had to be done about these unwanted immigrants.

They are bad people, he said: “A South African may take your cellphone, but he won’t kill you. A foreigner will take your phone and kill you.”

Beyond that, he said, immigrants were too easy to exploit.

“White people hire the foreigners because they work hard and they do it for less money,” Mr. Booysen said. “A South African demands his rights and will go on strike. Foreigners are afraid.”

- The NYT

A burnt and injured man lies in front of a shack during clashes east of Johannesburg, South Africa. Siphiwe Sibeko/Reuters

Many of the foreigners are not surprised at what has been unleashed against them. Hostility to Africans from other parts of the continent has long been rife in South Africa but has escalated with the arrival of the Zimbabweans who are popular with local employers because many are well educated, speak good English and are seen as working harder than South Africans.

Seven people were murdered in March, including a Somali, Zimbabweans and Pakistanis, in attacks near Pretoria. In January, two Somali shop owners were killed in the Eastern Cape.

"They always hated us," said Muzenda. "We thought this might happen."

- The Guardian

Raj Thackeray’s Maharastra Navnirman Sena (MNS) has threatened to use force to expel outsiders from the state if the situation doesn’t improve for the locals.
After attacking North Indians and targeting the superstar Amitabh Bachchan (who is from Uttar Pradesh), the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) has now picked private firms in the western state as their next prey. MNS asked six private firms to reserve 80% of the posts for only local candidates or ‘bhoomiputras’ – those who had been living in the state for the past 15 years.
The verbal attacks and increasing resentment towards the Hindi-speaking people, who have contributed much to make Mumbai what it is today, could turn into a large-scale violence if the government fails to address the genuine demands of the local populace. Similarly, what role the media choose to play is also equally important to create a favourable environment and promote social harmony in the region.

Let’s hope the Maoists don’t use anti-Madhesi sentiment rife in the hills and valleys to become the sovereign authority in Nepal. Let’s hope the MNS gets its genuine demands fulfilled through fair politics and goodwill than fueling violence or hatred. Let’s hope the increasing anti-Indian sentiment in Europe and America will come to an end.

With a rapid globalization process, the signs of confrontations of this nature and increasing anti-immigrant sentiment were inevitable. The greatest challenge across the world today is not only managing globalisation but also diminishing differences among the people coming from different socio-cultural heritage. Instead of trying to lure foreign investment and manpower or dreaming of expanding borders to the moon and stars and occupations of foreign countries, the governments should try their best to ensure the well-being of their citizens at home.

At the same time, let’s not forget that only a few leave their home to satisfy the wild fantasy of an adventure, most of them have no choice because of the inadequacy of their governments at home. The South African government has failed to provide security to the immigrants who have played determining role to boost its economy. The South African government must save the immigrants and compensate them for the damages. It would be no surprise if those behind the massacre get out of the tragedy unpunished and with a renewed enthusiasm to wreck devilish plans to spill even more blood lest the government upholds laws and punish those found guilty. Given the current situation in the country, it is very unlikely that justice will prevail. What is necessary is will, but it is what seems lacking.

Read-

South Africans Take Out Rage on Immigrants
Thousands seek sanctuary as South Africans turn on refugees
A Thackeray Act
A brief MNS listing

Read More...

May 18, 2008

Power of Images

View from the Window at Le Gras / Joseph Nicéphore Niépce

The grainy picture above is the world’s first photograph called "View from the Window at Le Gras" (circa 1826), taken and developed by French photographer pioneer Joseph Nicéphore Niépce. He called this process "heliography" or sun drawing - it certainly was a long process: the exposure time was about 8 hours.

"Dalí Atomicus" / Philippe Halsman, 1948

Philippe Halsman is quite possibly the only photographer to have made a career out of taking portraits of people jumping. But he claimed the act of leaping revealed his subjects’ true selves, and looking at his most famous jump, "Dalí Atomicus," it’s pretty hard to disagree.

The photograph is Halsman’s homage both to the new atomic age (prompted by physicist’ then-recent announcement that all matter hangs in a constant state of suspension) and to Dalí’s surrealist masterpiece "Leda Atomica" (seen on the right, behind the cats, and unfinished at the time). It took six hours, 28 jumps, and a roomful of assistants throwing angry cats and buckets of water into the air to get the perfect exposure.

But before settling on the "Atomicus" we know today, Halsman rejected a number of other concepts for the shot. One was the idea of throwing milk instead of water, but that was abandoned for fear that viewers, fresh from the privations of World War II, would condemn it as a waste of milk. Another involved exploding a cat in order to capture it "in suspension," though that arguably would have been a waste of cats.

Halsman’s methods were as unique as they were effective. His celebrity "jump" portraits appeared on at least seven Life magazine covers and helped usher in a new - and radically more adventurous - era of portrait photography.

- Ransom Riggs

Elliott Erwitt / Magnum Photos

NORTH CAROLINA—A black man drinks at segregated water fountains, 1950.


"Omaha Beach, Normandy, France" / Robert Capa, 1944

"If your pictures aren’t good enough," war photographer Robert Capa used to say, "you aren’t close enough." Words to die by, yes, but the man knew of what he spoke. After all, his most memorable shots were taken on the morning of D-Day, June 6, 1944, when he landed alongside the first waves of infantry at Omaha Beach.

Caught under heavy fire, Capa dove for what little cover he could find, then shot all the film in his camera, and got out - just barely. He escaped with his life, but not much else. Of the four rolls of film Capa took of the horrific D-Day battle, all but 11 exposures were ruined by an overeager lab assistant, who melted the film in his rush to develop it. (He was trying to meet the deadline for the next issue of Life magazine.)

In an ironic twist, however, that same mistake gave the few surviving exposures their famously surreal look ("slightly out of focus," Life incorrectly explained upon printing them). More than 50 years later, director Steven Spielberg would go to great lengths to reproduce the look of that "error" for his harrowing D-Day landing sequence in "Saving Private Ryan," even stripping the coating from his camera lenses to echo Capa’s notorious shots.

- Ransom Riggs

Thomas Hoepker / Magnum Photos

BROOKLYN, N.Y.—Young people watch a huge plume of smoke rise from lower Manhattan after the attack on the World Trade Center, Sept. 11, 2001.


Sources:

Slate-
Magnum Photos That changed The World

Neatorama
13 Photographs That Changed the World
The Wonderful World of Early Photography

Life-
100 Photographs That Changed The World

And

A discussion from the cinematography forum on the distinction between photography and cinematography… (link)

JLG, elsewhere known as Jean Luc Godard, once said that "Photography is truth" and then added that "Cinema is truth "24 times a second". Michael Haneke, on th other hand, said that "Cinema is 24 leis a second in an effort to represent the truth".

I don't know what is the difference really is, but it seems to have something to do with seconds and the number 24.

- George


Well, consider the effect of each form on its intended audience. What expectations does each fulfill? Both are recordings of past events; one appeals to the conscious mind, the other to the subconscious.

A photograph exists only in the past - in effect, a photograph stops time and forces us to contemplate an image of something (morning light in September of 1962, your mother when she was a child, etc.) that no longer exists. As viewers, we experience an ironic distance from the subject which moves us.

A film exists both in the past and in the present - a child chases (note the present tense!) after a ball into the middle of a busy street and we cringe in anticipation, even on the twelfth viewing. We are moved by the illusion of reality. Some filmmakers attempt to break this illusion and create the ironic distance that photography takes for granted; then we are aware that what we are watching is not life at all, but merely a crude imitation.

If a film does convince the subconscious mind of its reality, then it is almost inevitably narrative, because the camera by its nature captures a series of events, and the editor by default structures those events into a sequence. Even if a film is constituted entirely of still photographs, those images must appear for a definite length of time on screen, then to be succeeded by another image, and another, ad nauseum. So cinema is not necessarily cinematography, but cinematography is necessarily cinema.

I guess if you wanted to make the analogy, photography is to cinema as memories are to dreams. And Godard's films are lucid dreams!

- Satsuki

The photographer and the cinematographer were arguing about whose craft was the better.

"My pictures move" said the cinematographer.”

"Mine don't have to" replied the photographer.”

But really it is all about what you signify with the image(s) you record.

In a still photograph, you have to "read" the image and use your imagination to work out what happened a second (or a year or a lifetime) before the shot was taken, and what will happen next.

In a moving picture, you can at least see the immediate past and future of any given instant of time - but only as much as the filmmaker shows you. And there is still room for imagination and "reading" of the image to figure out what is happening outside the frame.

- Dominic Case

Read More...

May 17, 2008

Nepali Akash is Incredible

A photo blog to follow

Don’t you think Nepali Akash should come up with a photo exhibition? Nepali Akash, ‘his’ blog, is the best photo blog that I’ve seen… Maybe he can write few words (I hope he has written hundreds of poems in the wild there) as caption…This is the second time (first) I've been tempted to post his photographs...

Folks- this is 'real' Nepal!

Some of his photographs… and a lot more here.

Nepali Akash
Nepali Akash
Nepali Akash
Nepali Akash
Nepali Akash
Nepali Akash
Nepali Akash
Nepali Akash
Nepali Akash
Nepali Akash

© All photographs by Nepali Akash.

Read More...

Story of Gibson Nyandoro and Zimbabwe

MURDERED:

the war veteran who stood up to Mugabe

Tracy McVeigh
The Observer, Sunday May 18, 2008

Gibson Nyandoro told The Observer of his disillusionment with the regime. Now he is dead, a victim of new violence as Zimbabwe faces an election rerun

Gibson Nyandoro defected to MDC from Robert Mugabe's party, Zanu PF. His defiance cost him his life. Photograph: Robin Hammond


When Gibson Nyandoro raised his arm and slowly unclenched his fist to make the open-palmed salute of Zimbabwe's opposition at a rally eight weeks ago, it was a moment so loaded with symbolism that it stilled the crowd.

Only days before the presidential election, the gesture by this 53-year-old war veteran and former government supporter reflected a nation's rising defiance of President Robert Mugabe and the growing hope that a change of regime was really coming, and with it a path back to prosperity and freedom.

This weekend Nyandoro's body lies rotting somewhere near the army barracks where he was taken and tortured to death. His friends and family, and his fellow political campaigners, are all too scared to collect it for fear of a trap that might cost them their lives.

Nyandoro's story is the story of his country - he fought for its freedom in the independence struggle, he backed Mugabe's ruling party, Zanu-PF, acting as his henchman, one of the feared 'war vets' who seized white-owned farms, beating and sometimes killing anyone who got in their way. He told The Observer of how he regretted his violent past. 'People were very, very afraid,' he said. And how he had come to see that Mugabe had betrayed Zimbabwe and brought people not land but starvation. Now, he said, he wanted change.

The remarkable bravery of that public salute in March, watched by The Observer, was quashed in the most brutal way by the militias of Mugabe, the president Nyandoro had fought for.

They came for Nyandoro on 2 May as he sat at one of the long tables of the Zimunhu Bar in Epworth, 15 miles from Harare, chatting with old comrades about football and politics. Sungura music was playing, a fast beat danced with fast moving feet to imitate horses' hooves, and the drinkers were making their glasses of sour white beer made of sorghum last. Around 15 men, some in uniforms, arrived in cars, poured into the bar, smashing out with long iron bars before taking Nyandoro away.

A political 'cleansing' campaign in Zimbabwe is escalating fast. For the five weeks it took the electoral commission of Zimbabwe to announce the disputed results of the 29 March presidential vote there was an uneasy, but mostly peaceful, calm as everyone waited out the unexplained delay. When it finally came, it was claimed Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the Movement for Democratic Change, had beaten Mugabe - but only marginally, not by enough to prevent a second round. With that run-off election now set for 27 June, there is mounting evidence that the political violence against anyone who supported the MDC is increasing by the day as Mugabe and his Zanu-PF party supporters work hard to ensure that far fewer voters dare to defy them at the polling stations this time.

The body of Emmanuel Nelson, 30, has also not yet been returned to his family - he leaves a mother, a wife and a three-year-old daughter. He was taken from his home at Hopely Farm, a poor scrabble of half-built breeze block homes outside Harare, after dark by four men and bundled into a car. He was found last Monday, unconscious, bleeding and dumped in the road. He was taken to hospital, where he later died. He had been slashed in the face and stabbed in the side with a screwdriver.

Nelson's wife, Joice, sits outside their home with her mother-in-law receiving the mourners, their faces glazed with the shock of fresh grief. 'He was MDC and they say that is why he was killed. But I don't understand. My daughter keeps on asking and asking where he is. I have had to send her to a relative's house because I cannot answer her,' she said.

Tsvangirai was in Johannesburg last night, having delayed his return home for the third time in as many weeks, saying there was evidence of an assassination plot against him. He has been busying himself in Africa and Europe trying to raise support and cash for his campaign. An MDC rally planned for today in Bulawayo has been banned. At least 32 people have been killed. Hundreds have been beaten and tens of thousands have been intimidated into fleeing their homes. Young men are slipping away to South Africa or Botswana. Last week in Harvest House, the MDC's Harare offices, about 350 people were clustered in the corridors and stairwells, many with fresh bandages on wounds and broken limbs inflicted by soldiers and militias. Some had come straight from hospital; all were too afraid to go outside on to the streets or to go home.

With the desperate food shortages, unemployment and a lack of available cash in the country, MDC activists are struggling to feed the influx of refugees, but they can and do offer counselling for the traumatised and everywhere people huddle and listen to one another's stories.

But it was the story of Gibson Nyandoro that persuaded Batanai Muturu where his future lay. 'He was my friend and now he is killed. He was a soldier and they didn't care. He worked to help make people see that Mugabe is a wrong man. Hundreds of people are being attacked now, all the time. They take away MDC people's food and they go to funerals to arrest others there. They were expecting people to vote for Zanu-PF and now comes the punishment. They are trying to get rid of all these people. I don't think I will be in Epworth again.'

'This is it,' he said, lifting up a battered sports bag. 'All I have now, a few clothes.' He was leaving. 'I have no money for visas, so I will jump the border. We're not secure. Any time we can be killed.'

Muturu reached South Africa last Wednesday. He joins more than three million Zimbabweans now in exile.

Shaking hands at the end of the interview in March, Nyandoro spoke excitedly of his belief that change would come to the blighted country for which he had fought so many wars; he was going to persuade more war vets to join the opposition. With great warmth he thanked The Observer 'for your bravery in coming here to meet us'.

The irony is Nyandoro had no idea that it was his courage, the bravery of all Zimbabweans defying Mugabe's regime, that would cost him his life.


- Guardian , to read more on Zimbabwe (link)

Read More...

May 14, 2008

4th Time Around

CANG Xin, Trance, from the series Man and Sky as One, 2007 (lc)

Last week I finished AP Stylebook 2005 (download link). It’s the journalists’ bible, no doubt.

I wanted to go through this last year but for some reason never found time to do so. Here it was part of my ‘training’. I didn’t know I would be learning American English (and America itself) this soon. The language is tricky. I’m working on the technicalities of the medium too. (That is again scholarly ! Clarity has become an issue.) Neelu suggested I become kind to my readers. I’m not supposed to expect anything (some knowledge) from them! A “well-intentioned, poorly informed high status idiot”.

Ashish and his designer friends have been good company. Om, his animator friend, is moving to Gurgaon. Swapnil, who is working in an advertising firm there, told me a great deal about how the industry works. He listened to my ideas and said they were not coherent. I need to work hard to make them ‘bombs’. Tick, tick!

Then I met Utsav, my room partners’ another cinematographer and animator friend, Saturday evening. We went to a video installation exhibit. I wanted to see the NSD (National School of Drama). I finally got there. I had a very difficult time trying to discuss cinema with him. He was experient and his questions sharp. But my answers were less than perfect. Strange it may seem, but even after blogging for so long, I found his argument questioning its ‘importance’ convincing. We have to sell in the market. Not live in our fancy worlds. He said even youtube doesn’t help. I didn’t bring any portfolio with me. But now I’ve to put my ideas into words and keep them in one place so that I can show them to anyone anytime. Last but not the least, he said, continue studies. There’s a systematic way to enter the industry. Later, I wouldn’t find time or desire for that, he warned. (I still don’t know what I want to do. Right now, it’s some more paintings. I don’t even feel like writing anything anymore!)

‘Met’ Sudhir Mishra at a film festival. Asked him how he sees his ‘Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi’. He said some lifelong vestiges of pure passion, innocence… some kind of lurking. Love. A never-ending desire for something unattainable. He suggested Passion for Cinema where ‘he tries not to bullshit’. I was smiling at the thought - great minds ‘really’ think alike - when he was explaining this film. Unfulfilled love can turn into a risky obsession. And for some reason I’ve started to believe I’m not for love. “Perhaps, people of our kind can't love. The childlike people can; that's their secret.” (With the Childlike People, Siddhartha, Hermann Hesse)

Mom says I’ve to keep in touch with people. I try to. But I don’t think I’ve anything new to tell. I want to imagine. Forget what I left behind. Forget what I was looking for. The river knows. And the air. How I despise despair. I’m happy my departure coincided with Prachanda’s arrival. Things have changed so much. People too. But “the torture never stops… All men be cursed!”

Time for another Liquid Experiment. Music (besides books) keeps me occupied for most part of the day. Apostrophe (1974) and Zoot Allures (1976) and Born Under A Bad Sign (1967) are ‘new’ in my list. Just trying to quench thirst for guitar pieces. I also liked The King’s Jam (1968). Also got few more Aerosmith and Bob Dylan albums… 4th Time Around.

Born under a bad sign
I been down since I begin to crawl
If it wasn't for bad luck, I
wouldn't have no luck at all

- Albert King

Read More...

May 6, 2008

Barack Obama

Change- We can believe in

Maybe for a change which I can believe in, I’m following this year’s US presidential campaign religiously. Now with Barack Obama’s latest victory in North Carolina and his close call in Indiana, we can be almost certain that Obama is going to be the Democratic nominee.

I browsed through the NYT profiles of all three candidates last week. Hillary was intolerable- ARTIFICIAL. John McCain was admirable for his service to his country. But he wants to continue Bush’s policies and evil strategies and “we can't afford to give John McCain the chance to serve out George Bush's third term”. For some reasons, Obama lured me from the start. This is one guy who really believes in the power of truth.

After the controversy surrounding his former pastor’s remarks, I was very anxious about his future. Now I REALLY believe him, and that’s not because of his recent victories, but because I’ve always believed him.

Excerpts from his speech (full text) :

Yes, we know what's coming. I'm not naive. We've already seen it, the same names and labels they always pin on everyone who doesn't agree with all their ideas, the same efforts to distract us from the issues that affect our lives, by pouncing on every gaffe and association and fake controversy, in the hopes that the media will play along.

The attempts to play on our fears and exploit our differences, to turn us against each other for political gain, to slice and dice this country into red states and blue states, blue collar and white collar, white, black, brown, young, old, rich, poor... This is the race we expect, no matter whether it's myself or Senator Clinton who is the nominee. The question then is not what kind of campaign they will run; it's what kind of campaign we will run.

It's what we will do to make this year different. You see, I didn't get into this race thinking that I could avoid this kind of politics, but I am running for president because this is the time to end it.

We will end it -- we will end it this time not because I'm perfect. I think we know at this phase of the campaign that I am not.

We will end it not by duplicating the same tactics and the same strategies as the other side, because that will lead us down the same path of polarization and of gridlock.

We will end it by telling the truth.

Read More...

Being a little playful

After exhausting rehearsal for a play based on the Three Musketeers, Neelu gave her students a break. They were still in their mid-teens.
The boys took great pleasure rolling over each other on the grass like young cubs in the wild. Sadly, a bunch of the girls couldn’t. They were sitting at a corner watching their friends enjoying themselves in the open air. It reminded her they are after all ‘girls’.
“They can giggle, talk… but they can’t openly express themselves the way boys can. They are still girls,” she said while describing that unforgettable incident.

***

For a couple of days, my jaw was aching each time I chewed on something. Today I saw a dentist. Guess what? My wisdom teeth are coming out!
“So late,” I said.
“But mine are yet to come,” Deep said.
When I told Neelu, she was heartily laughing. (I’m the youngest in the office. Perhaps, that’s why she says she was my age ages and ages, maybe eons ago… But she sure is ‘a phenomenal woman’.)

***

Tanu saw Lord Kartik in me. He is worshipped in Kolkata region. Even Abhijeet shares her view. He also told me that Salik is a bird in Bangla.
“A sight of a pair of Salik brings good luck.”
But I’m still one !

***

Arvind shared his story while we were going to the bank. He said he didn’t know anybody when he had packed everything and landed in Delhi after completing his studies some twenty years ago. He said he was looking for a room with fresh vegetables in hands. Fortunately, he found one by the noon. Unfortunately, I haven't found one yet.
I won’t give Arvind any trouble for a few weeks (until the next payday. The bank’s slogan is sth like “we understand you” but they don’t know how a Nepali national can open an account in their bank!).
Arvind suggested I watch Sanjeev Kumar’s Naya Din Nayi Raat (1974) - the nine emotions (ras) of a man. It made me recall another movie that I’m longing to see - Sunil Dutt’s experimental Yaadein (1964). He was the sole actor in the film.

***
Cinematography forum is a great place to learn.

***
We’re doing modern Ramayana for the anniversary of the office next month. Maybe, Siddhartha will play Rama. I wanted to play Ravana- but Nidhi says I’ll only make a good junior Ravana. Maybe we can show a flashback, tell a story about teenage Ravana and then I can show my acting skills. But she wants me to play one of twins Lav-Kush. Or play the Laxman to Sidhhartha's Rama.

“Baby, paeir chhuyo!”

Read More...

May 5, 2008

'New' Indian Cinema

Of films and art


Photo: Shaju John

Shaji Karun feels a debate should start on why we don’t make it to international film festivals

Shaji Karun, the famous filmmaker from Kerala is a disappointed man these days. The former Chairman of the Kerala State Chalchitra Academy rues that this year there was no official entry from India to the Cannes film festival. And that it has been happening for the past six to seven years.

“They have taken films from small places like Singapore, Turkey, Vietnam and Cambodia but not India. It is because despite making 1000 films a year, we cannot produce even one film that matches international standards. They don’t say that openly to us. When I talked to them, they just said that ‘the gates are now closed’. I know what that means, because all my films get an entry there. From among 4000 entries they just take 20 films, and we don’t come remotely close to the top list. What’s the contribution of stars like Shah Rukh Khan to the world cinema? They made Aishwarya Rai represent India because a substantial part of the film festival was funded by L’Oreal and she is its brand ambassador. Do we just need cosmetics to represent us there? Aren’t they laughing at us by doing that? We can’t send good films, so they take a beautiful face from here!”

Shaji, incidentally, is currently working on an interesting project, Suryamukhi. This is his Hindi feature on the last six years of Raja Ravi Varma’s life. It stars Vidya Balan and Madhavan.
On Suryamukhi

“In his last years, Varma turned a printer — a businessman rather than an artist. It marked his failure. It is also about his association with wine and women,” he shares. Made with “extensive research”, and against the backwaters of Kerala, the film’s budget is 3.35 crores. The film will go on the floors in November, he adds.

For now, the filmmaker, whose debut film Piravi won the Camera d’ Or Mention d’honneur at the Cannes Film Festival, is busy finishing a feature film in Malayalam called Kutty Sarin. It is about the body of a boatman that remains unidentified. Three men come and talk about him. “It is produced by Reliance,” he says.

Rana Siddiqui, The Hindu


Now showing
Sharmi Ghosh Dastidar
India Today (Simply Delhi), April 9, 2008

Last year, when noted documentary filmmaker Yasmin Kidwai was screening her film, Chukker-Around Polo, in Delhi, a mediaperson asked her, “When are you doing the actual thing, a commercial Bollywood venture?”

Kidwai answered, “This is the actual thing for me.” As she recalls this incident, she says,
“The common perception is that filmmakers aren’t doing big work if they aren’t doing Bollywood potboilers. But there is a growing realisation that parallel cinema is important too.”

And young filmmakers in Delhi are doing just that: making documentaries, experimental and social films, far removed from the Bollywood prototype.

They are toying with themes, ideas and forms with one end goal—creative satisfaction.


Kumar’s next film will be released in places like Japan and Thailand among others
Kumar’s next film will be released in places like Japan and Thailand among others

The scope is so much greater as well, with city-based organisations like the Public Service Broadcasting Trust (PSBT) ready with help.
The plethora of film festivals also act as platforms to take these films to a global audience. As Ashvin Kumar, director of the Oscar-nominated short film Little Terrorist, says, “There are 1,500 world film festivals.
It is heartening that India is waking up to them.”

Simply Delhi caught up with some names who are making the most of the new avenues.

ASHVIN KUMAR

Kumar, 32, is happy working in Delhi. “I am not comfortable telling my stories in the Bollywood way. Every film, be it short, feature or documentary, will be liked if told interestingly. Hence I don’t conform to the Mumbai film industry format of telling stories,” says Kumar who owns Alipur Films, a production company based in London.

Kumar started with theatre and later switched to films. His work is released internationally as there is an audience for his films in different countries.

“I don’t relate to the concept of commercial cinema because even my films earn money worldwide. Many people confuse the Bollywood model with commerce,” he says.

“In Delhi, young filmmakers can start afresh because here there’s little or no history of filmmaking.” He is appreciative of PSBT too. “Till all film industries in India adopt a PSBT model, there will be not be any independent cinema movement,” he says.

He also feels that the scope of independent cinema is higher nowadays. “People are curious about local stories and the documentary or short feature format works better for that,” he says.

Kumar has recently finished his second feature film The Forest. “The Forest is the story of a leopard who turns man-eater after being hunted by poachers. It has an ecological message,” he says.

There’s also a digital film in the offing, set in Delhi and dealing with the high-society and the greed, apathy and snobbery attached to it.

Santana Issar
Santana Issar

SANTANA ISSAR

Twenty four-year-old Santana Issar’s first short film Bare (2006) received tremendous response from the international film fraternity, winning her the Francoise Ode Award at the Hamburg International Short Film Festival, 2007.

The film has also featured in 30 international film festivals including the South Asian International Film Festival and the San Francisco International Asian American Film Festival.

Filmmaking happened to Issar by accident. After graduating from St.Stephen’s College with a major in Economics, she realised that she didn’t like the subject and started working with a business television channel.

It was around that time that she came across a senior from college who was working on a corporate film and asked her to help him.

Subsequently, she heard that PSBT was inviting concepts from first-time filmmakers.

“They would fund the films and provide a professional filmmaker to help us. My idea for a short film got selected and my mentor, Pankaj Rishi Kumar, taught me every aspect of filmmaking. I never felt more engaged,” she says.

Bare, a 11-minute film, pieces together home videos shot by Issar’s parents two decades back. It is about Issar’s relationship with her father who was an alcoholic. Issar is currently working on her second film, Punches, Ponytails and Ringtones.

“I feel indebted to PSBT for helping me make a start,” says Issar, who also feels that there are plenty of opportunities available in the city.

“The moment you plug into the filmmaking network here, there are opportunities waiting for you.”

Pawas Bisht
Pawas Bisht

PAWAS BISHT

We caught up with Pawas Bisht, 24, at the A.J. Kidwai Mass Communication and Research Centre (AJKMCRC) in Jamia Milia Islamia University, where he teaches film production. “With students creating films through the year here, it helps me develop my skills too,” Bisht says.

Bisht fell in love with films in the last year of college (he studied in Hindu College), after which he enrolled at AJKMCRC. His first film, Body that will Speak, dealing with body image disorders, was the opening film of the PSBT International Film Festival on Gender and Sexuality in April 2007. Then came the big break.

Four Indian docu-filmmakers were chosen to work with Documentary Filmmakers Group (DFG) Production in London. His film, The House Remembers, about a bungalow in Ranikhet, was broadcast on Channel Four, London, and had many public screenings in England. His graduation project short film The Chase (based on two short stories by Italian writer Italo Calvino) was broadcast on CNBC TV 18 in Through the Looking Glass, a programme featuring films by independent filmmakers. It is also the official entry from AJKMCRC for the Students’ Academy Award this year.

“Earlier documentaries were staid and boring. But exciting new forms have evolved,” Bisht says adding, “In Delhi there is a culture of a literate film audience which appreciates these films. Digital technology and non-linear editing techniques are also reducing production costs.”

Bisht’s next film is for an organisation called MotiRoti in London. Twenty directors each from India,Pakistan and UK will contribute short films for a larger production called 360 Degrees. Bisht’s film for this project is 29N39, 79E34 Anandnagar. He is also doing an independent film on the Bhopal gas tragedy survivors.

Yasmin Kidwai
Yasmin Kidwai

YASMIN KIDWAI

Kidwai had enrolled for a film and video production course at St. Xavier’s College, Mumbai, and it was while working on a college film magazine that her interest in the craft developed.

“But I never conceived of making the Bollywood kind of films,” she says.
She joined a television channel in Delhi and started floating ideas for documentaries. In 1998, she directed a travelogue.

Her second film, Her Own Sky, dealt with the empowerment of women.

Her third docu-film, Where do I go from here?, on old age, went to the South Asian Film Festival at Kathmandu. It was Purdah Hain Purdah, sponsored by the PSBT, that made critics sit up and take note of her.

The film—about the relationship that Indian women have with the veil—travelled to various national and international film festivals.

Then came Chukker. “After extensive research, I’ve made the only film on polo in India.
It talks about the sport, the people associated with it and their efforts to sustain it.” It went to the South Asian International Film Festival in New York. During the making of Chukker Kidwai also set up Spring Box Films, a docu-production company.

Says Kidwai, “The popularity of films like 9/11 prove that the audience will notice you if you make a good short film or a documentary. And I feel I’m better off working in the capital because of the presence of a more thinking audience.”


Hone your skills at:

AJKMCRC
Jamia Milla Islamia University.
At: Jamia Nagar.
Tel: 26987285.
Write to: vcoffice @jmi.ernet.in.

Apeejay Institute of Mass Communication
At: Sector-8, Dwarka Institutional Area.
Tel: 25364523.

Sri Aurobindo Institute of Mass Communication
At: New Mehrauli Road, Adhchini.
Tel: 26561986.

Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan
SP College of Communication & Management.
At: KG Marg.
Tel: 23389449.

Asian Academy of Film & Television
At: Marwah Studios Complex. FC-14/15, Film City, Noida.
Tel: (95120)2515254.

Indian Institute of Mass Communication
JNU new campus.
At: Aruna Asaf Ali Marg.
Tel: 26160940.

Read More...

May 4, 2008

Should the 1950 treaty be scrapped?

K.V. Rajan
________________________________________
The Treaty of Peace and Friendship between India and Nepal is nearly six decades old; its relevance for India’s security in today’s context is limited and questionable.
________________________________________

The Maoist demand for “scrapping” the 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between India and Nepal has been greeted with a sense of alarm, as if it is something new or sinister. In fact, it is neither. The treaty, which was a straightforward imitation of understandings dating back to British India days, and basically offered economic opportunities in India for Nepalese nationals against Nepalese assurances that India’s security concerns would be respected, became an irritant in India-Nepal relations as soon as it was signed on 31 July, 1950. In Nepal’s eyes, India’s growing sense of insecurity, generated by an apparently aggressive and expansionist China, had compelled it to yield to expediency, abandon its support for the incipient democratic movement against the autocratic Rana regime, and seek to constrain Nepal’s sovereignty so that it was compatible with India’s security perceptions. The treaty, signed between the Indian Ambassador with Prime Minister Mohun Shumshere Rana (a disrespect for protocol which added insult to Kathmandu’s sense of injury) in the last days of his discredited regime, was accompanied by an exchange of letters which was not made public until many years later — in 1959, when they were placed on the table of the Indian Parliament.

The pitch of Nepalese criticism at any given time has depended on the degree of hostility or political insecurity felt by a particular power centre in Kathmandu vis-À-vis India. With the exception of King Tribhuvan (who escaped from Rana’s custody, was given refuge by Nehru, and who actually suggested Nepal’s merger with India), the monarchy in Nepal was actively engaged for several decades in undermining the treaty in letter, or spirit or both. Birendra’s Zone of Peace proposal was one such thinly disguised attempt. (An emissary from New Delhi was sent to Kathmandu to give a blow-by-blow picture of the implications for Nepal if the treaty was abrogated, and Birendra was said to be so shaken that the project was eventually abandoned).

But even when Nepal had a democratic dispensation, there was a certain unity across the political spectrum that, while the economic benefits accorded by the treaty were essential for Nepal, the treaty in its existing shape was not compatible with national self-respect. The Nepali Congress was the only party which usually hesitated to raise the matter of treaty revision, because of the close personal affinities between its leaders with Indian counterparts and their desire not to rock the boat of bilateral relations. But in private conversation they, too, voiced similar reservations.

In 1994, the CPN (UML) minority government assumed power after an election campaign dominated by issues such as abrogation of the 1950 treaty, ending the special relationship with India, renegotiating agreements on cooperation in water resources, and ending the recruitment of Nepalese gurkhas in the Indian Army — exactly the issues raised by the Maoists today. Yet, the UML was quick to moderate its positions as soon as it assumed office. Prime Minister Man Mohan Adhikari made it clear that he was not for abrogation of the treaty: “friendship treaties can be amended, they should never be abrogated.” An institutional arrangement at the Foreign Secretary level was set up in March 1995; but after a few rounds of discussion, it became clear that India was not interested in “amendment”: the treaty had either to be abrogated or maintained in its present form, as the text of the treaty did not provide for modifications. In private conversation, the Nepalese argued that this was not a very valid approach; the treaty had already been amended in 1950, even before the ink on the signatures was dry, by the exchange of letters accompanying it. It had effectively been amended again in 1965, through another exchange of letters which basically “committed” India to supply all of the Nepal Army’s armament needs. So why couldn’t it be amended again? But given India’s “either we keep it or you abrogate it” approach, Nepalese leaders did not go beyond making proforma noises about review of the treaty being under active discussion.

Gujral “doctrine”

The Gujral “doctrine,” which in effect promised all of India’s neighbours (especially Nepal) a bilateral relationship based on non-reciprocity, revived fresh hope in Nepal that the treaty could be “updated.” As Foreign Minister and later as Prime Minister, I.K. Gujral demonstrated a certain willingness to accommodate Nepalese expectations, as demonstrated by negotiations on the Mahakali Treaty and the transit route through India’s sensitive “Chicken’s Neck.” Foreign Minister Kamal Thapa visited India in August, 1998, with a “non-paper” which, for the first time, set out Nepalese ideas for a revision of the treaty. He made the mistake of publicising in advance the objective of his visit; the Nepalese media mentioned separate treaties on mutual security and economic cooperation accommodating both countries’ legitimate needs and concerns. But Thapa was sent back empty-handed — India’s traditional resistance to changing the treaty re-asserted itself.

Issue to the forefront

It has taken the remarkable electoral success of the Maoists to bring the issue again to the forefront. Should India continue to evade the issue, despite the widespread sentiment in Nepal favouring a revision? The treaty is nearly six decades old; its relevance for India’s security in today’s context is limited and questionable. China is no longer the only security concern in the sub-region, and in any case it is doubtful if it needs to ally itself with Nepal in order to create problems for India. The Himalayas have been replaced by the open border as India’s main defence perimeter. Pakistani activities in and through Nepal, migration, smuggling of narcotics and arms, terrorism, human trafficking, traditional cross-border trade and investment, regulation of the open border, development of border infrastructure and, above all, human insecurity have emerged as the urgent priorities. Management of water resources, environment and climate change, also have serious long-term implications for the security of both countries.

The treaty is already respected more in the breach than observance. Indian nationals in Nepal had long ago lost any entitlement under the “national treatment” clause; they can still travel to Nepal without a visa, and the Indian rupee is legal in Nepal, but permission to work, purchase property, and engage in activities on a par with the Nepalese is usually not available. Nepalese migrants to India, too, do not have the same rights they used to enjoy in many areas. Gurkha recruitment to the Indian Army continues but there is already a demand to phase this out and increase the intake of Indian Gurkhas.

Nepal has also from time to time projected its concerns about elements from India misusing the open border. Pro-democracy activists in Panchayat times, Maoists in recent years, armed Madhesi groups still more recently, have freely utilised the facility to challenge the government of the day, with Indian intelligence and security being either unable or unwilling to stop them. And the “national treatment” promised to Nepalese nationals in the matter of employment, business and property acquisition in India is becoming progressively more difficult to obtain.

India needs to review the treaty with an open mind rather than as a necessary evil — because the Maoists are demanding it. The first step would be to open the subject up for free debate within our own civil society, and explore the possibility of a cross-party consensus on the kind of treaty or cluster of treaties which would comprehensively address the real security concerns, military as well as non-conventional, for peoples on both sides of the border. Nepal should be encouraged to go in for a similar exercise. Thereafter, a track two interaction could seek to narrow the differences, with government representation but in the background. Official negotiations should ideally be the last phase. This long festering issue can and should be resolved to the mutual satisfaction of both countries in such a way that it promotes peace and development, and — hopefully — there are no future demands for its revision, at least for the next 50 years.

(K.V. Rajan was India’s Ambassador to Nepal from 1995 to 2000.)

Source: The Hindu, May 3, '08

Read More...

May 3, 2008

A Buddha project

“Images of Buddha can remind us to take a breath, to look around, to feel calm and compassionate, to be here now. You can notice Buddha almost anywhere — laundromats, store windows, barbershops, farmers' markets, souvenir stands, tucked away on someone's night table.

The Buddha Project encourages people worldwide to participate by submitting photos of found Buddha, sacred Buddha, ancient Buddha, kitschy Buddha, handmade Buddha.

An archive of hundreds of Buddha images may well generate good karma for everyone involved, viewers and contributors, alike.

Watch as it grows. As of February 8, 2008, there are 380 photos in the collection.

Hint: Click on the "Previous" button under the photos to see the most recent photos added to the project.

Please participate by contributing your images of Buddha. Notice Buddha in your surroundings and share your discoveries with others. It will make you feel good. Guaranteed.”

lens culture

Read More...

Recent News, Analysis and Opinions